Yannetti | Criminal Defense Law Firm | Boston, Salem & Dedham Massachusetts
Call For A Free Phone Consultation
Photo of the legal professionals at The Yannetti Criminal Defense Law Firm

Former Prosecutors, Aggressively Fighting For You

Photo of the legal professionals at The Yannetti Criminal Defense Law Firm

Court’s decision upholds collection of DNA samples

Much of the media attention at the end of the U.S. Supreme Court’s current term has been focused on the Court’s decisions regarding same-sex marriage and the Voting Rights Act. Nevertheless, this term saw some important decisions with implications for criminal law, particularly with respect to DNA testing.

The Court’s decision in Maryland v. King arose from the arrest of Alonzo Jay King, Jr. in 2009. Police initially arrested King on assault charges, but a DNA sample taken from him during the booking procedure revealed his connection to an unsolved 2003 rape case. He was eventually charged and convicted of that rape.

Maryland law allowed the police in this case to take a swab from King, in addition to his photograph and fingerprints, when he was being processed at the station. Obtaining swabs for the purpose of DNA collection after arrest is allowed by 28 other states, as well as the federal government. Nonetheless, King appealed his rape conviction, arguing that taking a DNA sample violated his Fourth Amendment rights against unlawful searches and seizures. The Maryland Court of Appeals – the highest court in the state – agreed and overturned King’s conviction on that basis.

After the government appealed, however, the Supreme Court restored King’s conviction, rejecting the argument that taking DNA samples from those suspected of crimes runs afoul of the Fourth Amendment. In the Court’s view, taking a DNA sample from a suspect is no more invasive than taking his fingerprints. The process is not only a valuable source of information that can help with investigating unsolved crimes, it also provides police with a means of suspect identification. It is, in short, a legitimate routine booking procedure.

Justice Antonin Scalia disagreed with the majority’s opinion. In Scalia’s view, routine collection of DNA samples by Maryland and other states is not a technique to identify suspects, but rather to solve crimes. Justice Scalia’s main objection was that this testing was being conducted not on someone convicted of a crime, but rather someone suspected of a crime.

Every state has a law requiring that law enforcement collect DNA samples from those convicted of felonies. As Justice Scalia pointed out, had the testing in this case been conducted after King had been convicted of the crime for which he was initially arrested, there would have been no Fourth Amendment issue.

The Court’s decision in King is likely to mean that police departments everywhere will take DNA samples as a matter of course when someone is arrested. There is no doubt that the collection of DNA samples helps law enforcement agencies solve crimes, but the privacy concerns are very real, despite the Court’s ruling in this case. This very well may be an issue that will require a second look.


Client Testimonials

5 Star

In the most painful times in our lives–David, Greg and Lisa showed us their professional best–dignified, warm, gracious. David and his team will not let you down, you will be taken well care of and most importantly superbly and justly represented…
Barbara Lynch

Oh my goodness David is a miracle worker! Unbelievable results! David is so highly respected by attorneys and judges and prosecutors that he really makes an impact in court and presented our friend in the best possible light…

Jude Dasilva

Greg Johnson and David Yannetti are simply the best. After having two other attorneys on a case, I hired them and got results where others failed. They work hard for you and I highly recommend them!…

Vivian Trinh

If it was not for Mr. Yannetti I could have lost my career and opportunity to come back to USA again given that I am not a US citizen. Thank you Mr. Yannetti for all you did for me and my family. You and your office were truly there for me in my darkest hour…

Ajit Gupta

Greg Johnson is a charming attorney and seems to truly care about his client’s and the outcome of their case. If you ever need an experienced criminal defense Lawyer, Yannetti Criminal Defense Law Firm is the one to call!…


“I’ve got your back,” he told me early on. David did not disappoint. By showing up with David in the courtroom, I felt I’d made a clear statement of intent. The case was duly dropped…

James Brooks

Martindale-Hubbell | AV | Preeminent | Peer Rated for Highest Level of Professional Excellence | 2020
Best Lawyers | Best Law Firms | U.S. News | 2022
Avvo | 10.0 | Superb | Top Attorney Criminal Defense
Super Lawyers
Fox News | Criminal Defense Analyst
CNN | Criminal Defense Analyst
ID | Investigation Discovery | Consultant
Massachusetts | Lawyers Weekly | Criminal Defense Expert