Yannetti | Criminal Defense Law Firm | Boston, Salem & Dedham Massachusetts
Call For A Free Phone Consultation
Photo of the legal professionals at The Yannetti Criminal Defense Law Firm

Former Prosecutors, Aggressively Fighting For You

Photo of the legal professionals at The Yannetti Criminal Defense Law Firm

As smart homes become more common, privacy may become less protected

Devices can track out every move, even our conversations. How much of this can police access?

What is privacy? In a world where social media updates occur in real time, where our smartphones can track our locations and where our homes have devices that are always listening, this question may be more important than ever.

Is this information ours and ours alone? How much of the information does the platform of the provider keep? Can the police access this data? What is a reasonable expectation of privacy for the user?

The answer may depend on the situation. In some cases, devices or software that we use to make our everyday lives easier may include agreements that define how the data collected by the software will be used – essentially defining privacy for us, whether we review them or not.

The popular doorbell service Ring provides a telling example. In addition to alerting members of a household that someone is at the front door, the Ring system also includes a video camera and a recording device. This allows the homeowner to see who is at the front of their home in real time and to have a recording if needed later. Under the Ring service agreement, police are given access to a special portal that allows them to communicate with Ring users. This can result in a request for data saved on their system. If the Ring user refuses, police can go directly to Ring to request the information.

Ring is not alone. Other examples of devices that collect personal information that can be used during a criminal investigation include:

· Ride share. Apps like Uber and Lyft result in location information. In most situations, these platforms only require a subpoena in order to provide the police with this information. A subpoena is different than a warrant. In order to get a warrant, the police requesting the warrant must generally establish probable cause to a neutral magistrate or judge. This requires evidence to support the contention that the information they are seeking is related to a criminal matter. A subpoena does not have this requirement. As a result, it is far easier for police to get a subpoena.

· Social media. Instagram and Facebook also only require a subpoena. Snapchat has an even lower standard. This platform will provide data if it determines the request is “reasonable.”

· Smart homes. Devices like Alexa and Echo are also gathering information in many homes throughout the country. Although they are only supposed to begin listening once key words are detected, there are questions about how much information these devices actually gather. A recent case may provide more information. In that case, a New Hampshire judge required Amazon’s Echo to provide data to enforcement officers investigating a double murder.

These examples are just a few. As such, anyone facing allegations of a crime or actual charges would be wise to act to protect his own interests. Law enforcement will scour all available means to gather evidence to build a case against you. It is wise to find legal counsel that will advocate for your interests to counter these tactics and maintain your innocence.


Client Testimonials

5 Star

In the most painful times in our lives–David, Greg and Lisa showed us their professional best–dignified, warm, gracious. David and his team will not let you down, you will be taken well care of and most importantly superbly and justly represented…
Barbara Lynch

Oh my goodness David is a miracle worker! Unbelievable results! David is so highly respected by attorneys and judges and prosecutors that he really makes an impact in court and presented our friend in the best possible light…

Jude Dasilva

Greg Johnson and David Yannetti are simply the best. After having two other attorneys on a case, I hired them and got results where others failed. They work hard for you and I highly recommend them!…

Vivian Trinh

If it was not for Mr. Yannetti I could have lost my career and opportunity to come back to USA again given that I am not a US citizen. Thank you Mr. Yannetti for all you did for me and my family. You and your office were truly there for me in my darkest hour…

Ajit Gupta

Greg Johnson is a charming attorney and seems to truly care about his client’s and the outcome of their case. If you ever need an experienced criminal defense Lawyer, Yannetti Criminal Defense Law Firm is the one to call!…


“I’ve got your back,” he told me early on. David did not disappoint. By showing up with David in the courtroom, I felt I’d made a clear statement of intent. The case was duly dropped…

James Brooks

Martindale-Hubbell | AV | Preeminent | Peer Rated for Highest Level of Professional Excellence | 2020
Best Lawyers | Best Law Firms | U.S. News | 2022
Avvo | 10.0 | Superb | Top Attorney Criminal Defense
Super Lawyers
Fox News | Criminal Defense Analyst
CNN | Criminal Defense Analyst
ID | Investigation Discovery | Consultant
Massachusetts | Lawyers Weekly | Criminal Defense Expert