Boston Armed Robbery Defense Lawyer
Although there are any number of fact scenarios that could lead to armed robbery charges, these cases generally fall into three categories:
- Stranger stick-up cases.
- Store or bank robberies where someone displays or mentions a weapon. Please note that in Massachusetts, you do not have to actually have a weapon to be charged with armed robbery. All you have to do is mention that you have a weapon -- and thereby put an alleged victim in fear -- and that could be sufficient for the charge.
- Robbery in a home, which actually transforms the crime in Massachusetts into "armed home invasion" or "armed burglary."
Many armed robbery cases are identification cases. In other words, the prosecutor's key evidence comes from an alleged victim or an eyewitness viewing a photo array or a lineup and pointing out the suspect. In identification cases, there are certain procedural safeguards that have been put in place by both the U.S. Supreme Court and the Supreme Judicial Court of Massachusetts to make sure the identification was not unnecessarily suggestive, that the defendant received due process, and that his or her rights were preserved. Attorney Yannetti and his associates are experienced in handling identification cases and have successfully filed and argued motions to suppress identification evidence. A successful motion to suppress identification, of course, may leave the state with no case against you, and force the prosecutor to dismiss the charges entirely.
An experienced and skillful criminal defense attorney may also seek to suppress from evidence any weapon that was seized in connection with the alleged crime. The police must follow certain procedures under state and federal law when they conduct a search for a weapon. If the police failed to abide by those procedures, a motion to suppress evidence of a weapon could be successful. That, in turn, may force the Commonwealth to reduce the charge to unarmed robbery or larceny from a person -- or may be forced the Government to dismiss the charges altogether.
Discovery motions are critical for the defense of armed robbery cases. Early on, it is important to preserve evidence that might be lost, such as tapes from surveillance cameras. An experienced attorney realizes that the preserving evidence can make the difference between winning or losing a case.
The law, of course, is constantly changing in many areas. For years, prosecutors were able to call on ballistics experts to testify that a spent bullet recovered at a crime scene was fired by a particular firearm. Under a recent U.S. District Court ruling, an expert ballistician may no longer testify with such specificity and certainty. Now, the expert witness in federal court may only testify that there are markings on a bullet which are similar to those fired by a particular weapon. This is less powerful testimony and may be exploited by an experienced criminal defense attorney. Fingerprint evidence is facing similar legal challenges right now. In short, if you are charged with the serious crime of armed robbery, you should ensure that your attorney is experienced in these cases, and is up-to-date on recent case law. If you retain the Yannetti Criminal Defense Law Firm, you will have that assurance.
Free Phone Consultation: Contact Boston Armed Robbery Defense Lawyers at the Yannetti Criminal Defense Law Firm.
Sample Armed Robbery Cases:
October 27, 2010
Quincy District Court
Docket No. 1056-CR-4431
In a case that generated a lot of publicity, Client, a 23 year-old man, was charged with multiple counts of Armed Robbery and Kidnapping. The police alleged that Client had placed an advertisement on Craig's List, then robbed the buyers at gunpoint when they arrived at an agreed-upon location. When Client's father hired Attorney Yannetti, Client was being held in custody in lieu of $10,000 cash bail. When Attorney Yannetti appeared for Client's arraignment, the prosecutor asked the judge to increase Client's bail to $100,000. Instead, Attorney Yannetti persuaded the judge to reduce Client's bail to $7,500. Client posted that bail shortly thereafter and returned home to his father. Over the next two months, Attorney Yannetti presented exculpatory information to the prosecutor, to show that this case was not what it first appeared to be. Today, when the case was scheduled for a probable cause hearing, Attorney Yannetti persuades the prosecutor and the judge to dismiss all charges. Result: Case Dismissed.
August 11, 2008
Springfield Superior Court
Docket No. 2006-1315
Client, a 26 year-old man, faced allegations that he and his co-defendant had robbed and shot a man on Christmas Day in 2003. Both were charged with armed robbery by means of a handgun, assault and battery by means of a dangerous weapon and assault by means of a dangerous weapon. Both also remained at-large for several years, with warrants outstanding for their arrest. When Client learned that the police were looking for him, he hired Attorney Yannetti. Attorney Yannetti negotiated with the prosecutor in order to arrange for client's surrender before the court in the summer of 2006. During the bail hearing at Client's arraignment, Attorney Yannetti succeeded in convincing the judge to allow Client to remain free on personal recognizance and also to return to his home state while the case was pending. On June 30, 2008, Client elected to admit to the indictments after having learned that the alleged victim appeared in court on the trial date, ready to testify to the robbery and shooting. Client's bail was therefore revoked and he was taken into custody. Today, Attorney Yannetti argues before the judge that Client should be released from custody and instead placed on probation. Result: Client given a "time-served" split sentence, whereby he is released from custody after spending 43 days in jail. Client is placed on probation for five years.